Elsevier

Journal of Catalysis

Volume 282, Issue 1, 15 August 2011, Pages 47-53
Journal of Catalysis

Exploring the void structure and activity of RUB-39 based expanded materials using the hydroconversion of decane

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.05.022Get rights and content

Abstract

The layered silicate RUB-39 can be transformed by topotactic condensation into RUB-41 (RRO), a zeolite with 8- and 10- ring pores. If the layered RUB-39 is first silylated with dichlorodimethylsilane (DCDMS) or hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDS), an interlayer expanded structure is created after calcination. The DCDMS expanded material contains 10- and 12-ring pores instead of 8- and 10-ring pores. Detailed physicochemical characterization showed that the Al content is not significantly changed during the expansion. In the hydroconversion of decane, the expanded materials have a significantly increased activity, as demonstrated by the lower temperatures at which isomerization and cracking occur. Detailed comparison of the product selectivities obtained with RUB-41 or with its expanded analogs shows that the void structure of the expanded materials is significantly less constrained, as reflected in the distribution of methylnonane isomers, of the ethyloctane vs. methylnonane isomers, and in the ratio of monobranched vs. dibranched isomers.

Graphical abstract

Starting from the layered precursor RUB-39, a interlayer expanded material containing Al is prepared. The results of the decane hydrocracking prove that the pores are effectively expanded in comparison with the related zeolite RUB-41.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (163KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights

► The layered precursor of RUB-41 was expanded with DCDMS and HMDS. ► Expanded materials show an increased activity in the hydroconversion of n-decane. ► The distributions of the reaction products indicate an expanded pore structure.

Introduction

Zeolites are widely used as heterogeneous catalysts for the production of petrochemicals and fine chemicals. Because of the permanent quest for more sustainable processes and because of the ever more demanding requirements to the catalysts for these processes, there is a continued search for new zeolite materials with improved catalytic properties [1]. In an innovative approach to zeolite synthesis, layered silicates are prepared in a first step; upon calcination, these may transform by topotactic condensation into three-dimensional silicate frameworks. In some cases, the topotactic condensation of new layered materials results in well-known structures. For example, PREFER transforms upon calcination into ferrierite [2].

In other cases, the calcination of the layered precursor materials results in previously unknown structures. For instance, EU-19 [3], Nu-6 [4], PLS-1 [5], or RUB-18 [6] transform upon calcination into EU-20b, Nu-6(2), CDS-1, and RUB-24, with CAS, NSI, CDO, and RWR topologies, respectively. However, in all these materials, the pores are narrow and hardly accessible to reactants. In order to create more attractive materials for catalysis, the layered precursor can be treated after synthesis [7], [8]. Delamination can be achieved via swelling of the lamellar precursor with a surfactant. For instance, full delamination of the precursor material MCM-22(P) resulted in the formation of ITQ-2 [9]. Alternatively, MCM-22(P) can be pillared by the use of a swelling agent and a treatment with tetraethylorthosilicate, resulting in a material named MCM-36 [10]. ITQ-2 and MCM-36 showed an improved access to the catalytic sites in the hydroconversion of n-decane compared with MCM-22 [11]. Recently, zeolite UTL was converted into a lamellar material with zeolite-like layers. This new material can be further modified in a similar way to other layered materials [12].

A new and versatile method of converting 2D lamellar precursors has been reported by the groups of Wu, Tatsumi, and coworkers [7], [13]. They prepared Interlayer Expanded Zeolites (IEZ) by inserting monomeric Si compounds into the interlayer spaces via a one-step dialkoxysilylation followed by the removal of the organic moieties. IEZ materials were prepared starting from layered silicates PLS-1, MWW(P), PREFER, and MCM-47. Diethoxydimethylsilane (DEDMS) or dichlorodimethylsilane (DCDMS) was employed as silylating agents. The two methyl groups serve to avoid intermolecular condensation; if triethoxymethylsilane or tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) are used, condensation of the silanes can occur and amorphous silica is deposited on the zeolite crystals.

A recent addition to the group of layered silicate precursors is RUB-39. Upon calcination, this material yields the zeolite RUB-41 with RRO topology [14], [15]. RUB-41 contains a 2-dimensional pore system with intersecting 8- and 10-ring pores. From structure analysis, their dimensions are determined as 0.58 × 0.41 nm (8MR) and 0.59 × 0.41 nm (10MR). In previous work, we demonstrated the selective uptake of trans-2-butene and cis-2-butene from an isomeric butene mixture on the all silica RUB-41 [16]. This selectivity was ascribed to the distorted 10-ring present in RUB-41. In later work, Al was incorporated into this structure. (H)Al-RUB-41 was employed in the amination reaction of methanol with ammonia. (H)Al-RUB-41 showed a high selectivity (87%) toward monomethylamine and dimethylamine, a behavior which is typically expected for a small pore zeolite. This was attributed to the unique pore architecture of the material with its distorted 10 channels, which for this reaction seem spatially more restrictive than the 10-MR in, e.g., MFI or MEL zeolites [17].

Here, we report on materials obtained by interlayer silylation of the layered RUB-39 precursor material. After exposure of RUB-39 to dichlorodimethylsilane (DCDMS) or hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDS), followed by calcination, new expanded structures are formed. In this work, the catalytic effect of the interlayer expansion is investigated using the hydroconversion of decane as a test reaction. The composition of the branched isomerization products formed from decane is used to evaluate whether effectively the interlayer expansion results in a modified intracrystalline zeolite pore architecture.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

Al-RUB-39 was synthesized by a 2-step synthesis procedure. First 0.215 mol NaOH was dissolved in 230 mL H2O; then, 653.4 g of a 39 wt.% solution of dimethyldipropylammoniumhydroxide in H2O was added, followed by 8.6 g RUB-39 seeds. After 10 min stirring, 208.5 g aerosil 200 was added. After aging of the gel for 1 h at room temperature, it was kept in a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave and stirred at a temperature of 140 °C at 15 rpm for 48 h. Hereafter, the mixture was cooled down and 5 g

Characterization

The layered RUB-39 was synthesized following the recipe mentioned in the experimental section. When this precursor is calcined, it transforms by topotactic condensation into the RUB-41 zeolite with RRO topology [15]. The precursor can also be expanded with DCDMS and HMDS. The precursor that was used for these expansions originates from the same synthesis batch as the RUB-41 zeolite and has a Si/Al ratio of 51. Fig. 1 shows SEM micrographs of the materials RUB-41, DCDMS, and HMDS expanded RUB-39.

Conclusion

Starting from the layered precursor RUB-39, different materials were synthesized. If RUB-39 is calcined, the 8- and 10-MR zeolite RUB-41 is obtained. If RUB-39 is silylated with HMDS or DCDMS, new materials are formed with expanded pore windows. In the hydroconversion of decane, it appears that RUB-41 largely shares characteristics of 10-MR zeolites. Apparently, some of the criteria employed, like the ethyloctane formation, seem to indicate that RUB-41 is slightly more spacious than other 10-MR

Acknowledgments

Support form BASF AG is acknowledged in the frame of an INCOE project. BT thanks IWT-Flanders for a fellowship.

References (22)

  • B. Marler et al.

    Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.

    (2006)
  • B. Marler et al.

    Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.

    (2005)
  • S. Inagaki et al.

    Micropor. Mesopor. Mater.

    (2011)
  • Y.X. Wang et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2005)
  • B. Tijsebaert et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2011)
  • J.A. van Bokhoven et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2002)
  • J.A. Martens et al.

    Zeolites

    (1984)
  • B. Yilmaz et al.

    Top Catal.

    (2009)
  • L. Schreyeck et al.

    Chem. Soc. – Chem. Commun.

    (1995)
  • S. Zanardi et al.

    Angew. Chem. – Int. Edit.

    (2004)
  • T. Ikeda et al.

    Angew. Chem. – Int. Edit.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text